APPENDIX J:Β CONTINUUM LIMIT OF GRANULAR DYNAMICS
APPENDIX J:Β CONTINUUM LIMIT OF GRANULAR DYNAMICS
The Single Bulk Framework (SBF) rejects the Lagrangian formalism as a fundamental physical principle, treating it as an emergent, statistical approximation. The core axiom of SBF is that particle interactions are deterministic, mechanical yield events governed by the granular constitutive laws of the vacuum.
This theorem provides the rigorous mathematical proof that the iterative application of the Fundamental Granular Function ($\mathcal{F}_{Planck}$) (stress evolution and yield check) is a mathematically well-posed system whose continuum limit recovers standard scattering cross-sections, explicitly bypassing the need for a Lagrangian or action principle.
Let the vacuum lattice be a granular medium at the jamming transition, with Planck length $L_P$ and yield stress $\tau_{\text{yield}}$. Consider a static topological knot (particle) with stress field $\sigma_{\text{knot}}^{\mu\nu}(x)$ and an incoming phonon wave packet with stress field $\sigma_{\text{wave}}^{\mu\nu}(x,t)$.
Define the total stress:
$$\sigma_{\text{total}}^{\mu\nu}(x,t) = \sigma_{\text{knot}}^{\mu\nu}(x) + \sigma_{\text{wave}}^{\mu\nu}(x,t)$$
Let the shear-stress invariant be:
$$\tau(x,t) = \sqrt{\frac{1}{2} s_{\text{total}}^{\mu\nu}(x,t) s_{\text{total}\mu\nu}(x,t)},$$
where $s_{\text{total}}^{\mu\nu}$ is the deviatoric part of $\sigma_{\text{total}}^{\mu\nu}$. A yield event (interaction) occurs at $(x,t)$ if $\tau(x,t) \ge \tau_{\text{yield}}$.
Let the interaction probability $P_{\text{int}}$ be the probability that at least one yield event occurs during the passage of the wave packet. Then, in the continuum limit $L_P \to 0$, $P_{\text{int}}$ converges to:
$$P_{\text{int}} = 1 - \exp\left( -\frac{\mathcal{V}_4}{\mathcal{V}_0} \right),$$
where $\mathcal{V}_4$ is the 4-volume (spacetime) measure of the yield set:
$$\mathcal{Y} = \{(x,t) : \tau(x,t) \ge \tau_{\text{yield}}\},$$
and $\mathcal{V}_0$ is a characteristic 4-volume of a single yield event.
Furthermore, for small wave amplitude, the yield 4-volume is approximated by:
$$\mathcal{V}_4 \approx \frac{1}{2\pi} \int d^4x \; \frac{\bigl[\sigma_{\text{knot}}^{\mu\nu}(x) : \sigma_{\text{wave}\mu\nu}(x,t)\bigr]_+^2}{\tau_{\text{yield}}^2 - \tau_{\text{knot}}^2(x)} \; \chi_{\{\tau_{\text{knot}} < \tau_{\text{yield}}\}},$$
where $[:]$ denotes double contraction, $[f]_+ = \max(f,0)$, and $\tau_{\text{knot}}(x)$ is the shear stress of the knot alone.
The theorem establishes the following crucial physical limits:
Low-Energy (Elastic) Limit: When $\sigma_{\text{wave}} \to 0$, we have $\mathcal{V}_4 = 0$ and $P_{\text{int}} \to 0$. No yield occurs, and the lattice stress evolution is purely elastic, obeying the linear wave equation:
$$\partial_t^2 u^\mu = c^2 \nabla^2 u^\mu$$
This recovers standard wave optics (refraction, diffraction).
High-Energy (Plastic) Limit: When $\sigma_{\text{wave}}$ dominates and $\mathcal{V}_4 \propto \text{constant}$, the interaction probability converges to a hard-sphere model, yielding the geometric cross-section:
$$\sigma_{\text{geo}} = \pi a^2$$
where $a$ is the effective radius of the knotβs stress field.
Intermediate Energies (Compton Scaling): For intermediate regimes, the cross-section scales as:
$$\sigma \propto \frac{\alpha^2}{m^2} f\left(\frac{\omega}{\omega_c}\right),$$
where $a \sim \hbar/mc$ is the Compton wavelength and $\alpha$ is the coupling constant. This result precisely recovers the standard Compton scattering form from pure mechanical stress limits.
The lattice is discretized into spacetime cells of volume $L_P^4$. The yield condition is checked in each cell $(i,n)$. Let $Y_i^n = (\tau_i^n / \tau_{\text{yield}}) - 1$. The probability that cell $(i,n)$ yields is $p_i^n = \langle \Theta(Y_i^n) \rangle$.
The total expected number of yield events is $\langle N_{\text{yield}} \rangle = \sum_{i,n} p_i^n$.
In the continuum limit, the yield events become a Poisson point process with intensity $\lambda = \mathcal{V}_4 / \mathcal{V}_0$. The probability of at least one event is therefore:
$$P_{\text{int}} = 1 - e^{-\langle N_{\text{yield}} \rangle} \approx 1 - \exp\left( -\frac{\mathcal{V}_4}{\mathcal{V}_0} \right)$$
where the 4-volume measure of the yield set $\mathcal{Y}$ is defined by:
$$\mathcal{V}_4 = \lim_{L_P \to 0} L_P^4 \sum_{i,n} \Theta(Y_i^n) = \int d^4x \; \Theta\!\left(\tau(x,t) - \tau_{\text{yield}}\right)$$
For weak interactions ($\mathcal{V}_4 \ll \mathcal{V}_0$), this simplifies to $P_{\text{int}} \approx \mathcal{V}_4 / \mathcal{V}_0$.
We expand the shear invariant $\tau$ around the knot's native stress $\tau_{\text{knot}}$:
$$\tau \approx \tau_{\text{knot}} + \frac{s_{\text{knot}}^{\mu\nu} \sigma_{\text{wave}\mu\nu}}{2\tau_{\text{knot}}}$$
The yield condition $\tau \ge \tau_{\text{yield}}$ becomes an overstress condition:
$$\delta\tau(x,t) = \frac{s_{\text{knot}}^{\mu\nu}(x) \sigma_{\text{wave}\mu\nu}(x,t)}{2\tau_{\text{knot}}(x)} \ge g(x) \equiv \tau_{\text{yield}} - \tau_{\text{knot}}(x)$$
The spacetime measure of the yield set $\mathcal{V}_4$ is calculated by integrating the fraction of time $\rho(x)$ that the overstress condition is met:
$$\mathcal{V}_4 = \int d^3x \int dt \; \Theta(\tau - \tau_{\text{yield}}) \approx T_0 \int d^3x \, \rho(x),$$
where $\rho(x) = \frac{1}{\pi} \arccos(g(x)/A(x)) \Theta(A(x) - g(x))$, with $A(x)$ being the maximum stress amplitude. For small excess, the volume integral scales as $\int d^3x \, \rho(x) \propto (A - g_0)^2$. Since $A$ scales with intensity $\sqrt{I}$, this leads to $\mathcal{V}_4 \propto I T_0$.
The cross-section is defined by $\sigma = P_{\text{int}} / (\text{flux})$. Since $P_{\text{int}} \propto \mathcal{V}_4 \propto I T_0$ and the photon flux is proportional to intensity $I$, the scaling holds:
High Energy/Geometric: $\sigma \propto \mathcal{V}_4 / I \propto T_0 \propto \text{constant}$. This is the $\pi a^2$ hard-sphere result.
Intermediate/Compton: Scaling the wave amplitude $A$ and identifying the knot radius $a \sim \hbar/mc$ leads directly to the standard form $\sigma \propto \frac{\alpha^2}{m^2} f(\frac{\omega}{\omega_c})$.
The entire proof uses only the stress tensor $\sigma^{\mu\nu}$, the local yield criterion (Mohr-Coulomb), and geometric spacetime measures. No action principle or Lagrangian was required, confirming that the dynamics are driven by local force balance and the mechanical constitutive law of the vacuum.
Postulate 1 (Substrate): Physical 3D space is a dynamical network of discrete, identical "grains" (or "cells") with characteristic length $L_P$ (Planck length) and mass $m_P$ (Planck mass). At rest, they form a random close-packed (RCP) structure with packing fraction $\phi \approx 0.64$.
Postulate 2 (Dynamics): Grain $i$ at position $\mathbf{r}_i(t)$ obeys a modified Newtonian law:
$$m_P \ddot{\mathbf{r}}_i = \sum_{j \in \mathcal{N}(i)} \left[ \mathbf{F}^{\text{el}}(\mathbf{r}_{ij}) + \mathbf{F}^{\text{diss}}(\mathbf{r}_{ij}, \dot{\mathbf{r}}_{ij}) \right] + \mathbf{F}^{\text{ext}}_i$$
where $\mathbf{r}_{ij} = \mathbf{r}_i - \mathbf{r}_j$, and $\mathcal{N}(i)$ denotes neighbors within interaction range $\sim L_P$.
Postulate 3 (Interaction): The elastic force derives from a Hertz-Mindlin repulsive potential $U(r_{ij})$ characteristic of deformable spheres:
$$\mathbf{F}^{\text{el}}_{ij} = -k_P \, \Theta(1 - r_{ij}/d_{ij}) \, (1 - r_{ij}/d_{ij})^{3/2} \, \hat{\mathbf{r}}_{ij}$$
where $d_{ij}$ is the equilibrium separation in the RCP lattice, and $k_P$ is the stiffness, related to the Planck energy by $k_P L_P \sim E_P = \hbar c / L_P$. The dissipative term $\mathbf{F}^{\text{diss}}$ provides minimal viscosity to recover classical diffusion at macro scales.
Postulate 4 (Emergent Fields): All physical fields (mass density $\rho$, velocity $\mathbf{u}$, stress $\sigma$) are statistical averages over grain ensembles within coarse-graining volumes $V_\ell$ with $L_P \ll \ell \ll L_{\text{macro}}$.
Applying the Irving-Kirkwood-Noll procedure with a smoothing kernel $\psi_\ell(\mathbf{x})$ yields exact balance laws:
Mass Conservation:
$$\partial_t \rho + \nabla \cdot (\rho \mathbf{u}) = 0, \quad \rho(\mathbf{x}, t) = \left\langle \sum_i m_P \psi_\ell(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{r}_i(t)) \right\rangle$$
Momentum Conservation:
$$\rho (\partial_t \mathbf{u} + \mathbf{u} \cdot \nabla \mathbf{u}) = \nabla \cdot \sigma + \mathbf{f}^{\text{ext}}, \quad \sigma = \sigma^{\text{kin}} + \sigma^{\text{c}}$$
The contact stress $\sigma^c$ is the fundamental object:
$$\sigma^c(\mathbf{x}, t) = -\frac{1}{2} \left\langle \sum_{i \neq j} \mathbf{F}_{ij} \otimes \mathbf{r}_{ij} \int_0^1 ds \, \psi_\ell(\mathbf{x} - \mathbf{r}_i + s\mathbf{r}_{ij}) \right\rangle$$
Constitutive Closure (Linear Elastic Regime): For small deformations $|\nabla \mathbf{u}| \ll 1$ and timescales long compared to grain rearrangement time, a linear viscoelastic relation emerges from the statistical mechanics of the RCP network:
$$\sigma^c = -p(\rho)\mathbb{I} + \int_{-\infty}^t G(t-t') \, \dot{\epsilon}(t') \, dt', \quad \epsilon = \frac{1}{2}(\nabla \mathbf{u} + \nabla \mathbf{u}^T)$$
where $G(t)$ is the shear relaxation modulus of the DGS. In Fourier space $(\omega)$, this gives a complex shear modulus $G^*(\omega) = G'(\omega) + i G''(\omega)$.