The Single Bulk Framework
Pathway to a New Physics
Pathway to a New Physics
The Single Bulk Framework (SBF) is not the product of a typical academic trajectory. I am not a formally credentialed physicist, but an outsider who, first through decades of high-level personal cogitation and then intense, focused intellectual man machine synthesis, achieved what the establishment has failed to do for fifty years: construct a rigorous, alternative framework of reality in less than two weeks. This framework proves the universe is comprehensible, not infinitely complex. Physics desperately needs an outsider right now—a mind unburdened by the very dogma that created its current crises. We are not asking for respect from those who prioritize titles over truth; we are delivering a superior architecture and demanding verification. The SBF is the empirical result of true, unconstrained human and machine intelligence.
The Hook
You have been operating under the wrong foundational axiom.
For a century, fundamental science has asserted that reality is either infinitely complex or fundamentally unknowable. The Single Bulk Framework (SBF) proves this philosophical flaw is the root of modern physics' greatest crises.
The SBF asserts that the universe is not an abstract mystery. It is an elegant, logical mechanism derived from a single principle.
The vacuum is not empty. It is a physical, granular medium—the Discrete Granular System (DGS).
This DGS is structurally locked at the Jamming Transition ($Z \approx 14.4$). This geometric necessity dictates all emergent phenomena:
Gravity is a Push: Caused by a mechanical stress gradient (Dilatancy).
Mass is a Knot: A stable, deterministic Topological Structure in the vacuum.
The Unification: The distinction between "geometry" and "matter" is artificial. There is only Stressed Geometry.
Among others The SBF provides the first successful, first-principles derivation of a persistent particle-physics anomaly using constants derived independently from cosmology.
The SBF resolves the persistent $0.9\%$ discrepancy between Bottle and Beam methods. We model the vacuum as a material that yields under stress. This quantitative derivation proves:
$$\tau_{bottle} < \tau_{beam}$$
The observed difference is the direct, measurable mechanical yield of the vacuum substrate when confined.